Reform sought as cyber charter school costs top $42M in NEPA districts

As cyber charter school enrollment grew over the last decade, Carbondale Area School District’s budget reserves disappeared.


Now operating with a $2.5 million deficit, the district started its own cyber program last year, joining a growing number of districts trying to find relief.


The 37 school districts in Northeast Pennsylvania pay a combined $42 million in cyber charter school tuition each year. The total amount paid — and the way the state determines tuition — has many people calling for reform.


Cyber charter schools are privately operated, publicly funded schools authorized by the state and paid for by school districts. Advocates say cyber schools provide options for families seeking choice for their children’s educations. C


Children learn virtually on charter school-provided computers, at no cost to the families.The cost comes to the districts instead.


Bills in the state House and Senate would allow districts with their own cyber programs to stop paying tuition to cyber charter schools. If a student decided to attend the cyber charter school, the family would be responsible for the tuition.

Education Voters of Pennsylvania, a statewide public education advocacy organization, also called for reform. In a February report, the group found by basing cyber school tuition on what it actually costs to educate a child virtually, districts statewide could save more than $250 million annually.


In NEPA, savings could be as much as $24.5 million each year. In the 2017-18 school year, 2,799 students in Luzerne, Lackawanna, Monroe, Pike, Susquehanna, Wayne and Wyoming counties attended cyber charter schools.


“There are great proposals with cyber legislation,” said Robert Mehalick, Carbondale Area superintendent. “If that would come to fruition, it would be tremendous.”


Possible reform


Pennsylvania bases cyber charter tuition on the cost of educating a student in physical school buildings, with no relationship to the actual instructional costs for regular and special education instruction online.


In NEPA, those tuition costs range from $8,032 per non-special education student in Carbondale Area, to $14,718 for a non-special education student from Wallenpaupack Area.


Even if students from both districts attend the same cyber charter school, those districts pay different tuitions.


For a special education student, costs range from $16,225 in Hazleton Area, to $34,863 for Mountain View, according to the report from Education Voters. The group used 2016-17 numbers in its calculations.


With students learning from computers at home, charter schools have lower costs than school districts. The schools “have a higher student-to-teacher ratio than district schools and frequently use recorded programs that can be re-used in many classes or for students individually. Infrastructure is greatly reduced. In spite of this different cost structure, the state bases tuition on the cost of educating a child in the school district buildings and not on the actual cost of providing a cyber education,” according to the organization.


The report found that basing cyber school tuition on what it costs school districts to provide a full-time cyber education — $5,000 per student or less per year for a regular education student and basing tuition for special education students on the state’s special education funding formula, would save more than $250 million annually statewide.


Beyond concerns about academic performance, with cyber charter schools generally having lower proficiency rates than traditional school districts, local educators want to increase financial accountability.


Bob McTiernan, executive director of the Northeastern Educational Intermediate Unit and a former superintendent, knows about the issues of cyber charter school tuition.

“I think it’s unfairly tapped into district resources,” he said. “Districts aren’t paying the cyber schools the actual costs to educate... the cost to educate a student in cyber is irrelevant.”

Many students who attend cyber charter schools were previously home schooled or enrolled in private schools. When the student moves to a cyber school, the district in which the student resides picks up the cost. When students leave a district to attend a cyber charter school, the district cannot reduce fixed costs enough to make up for the cost of the tuition bill, according to Education Voters.


Meanwhile, Senate Bill 34 and House Bill 526, both introduced earlier this year and referred to their respective education committees, could change whether the cyber charter schools receive any funding at all.


If districts offered comparable online programs, families would have to pay to send their children elsewhere.


State Sen. John Blake, D-22, Archbald, signed on as a cosponsor of the Senate bill. While hoping lawmakers establish a bipartisan commission on charter school reform, something must be done immediately to ease school district’s burdens, he said.


“All we’re trying to do is level the playing field here,” he said. “I would hope it garners bipartisan support.”


State Rep. Tarah Toohil, R-116, Butler Twp., has cosponsored the bill in the House. Efforts to reach her were unsuccessful.

Ana Meyers, executive director of the Pennsylvania Coalition Of Public Charter Schools, called the efforts “blatant attacks.”


“The legislations that have been recently introduced would eliminate public school choice for parents by forcing students to remain with a district that does not serve and meet the expectations of families,” she wrote in a statement. “Cyber charter schools are schools of choice in Pennsylvania whose demand has continued to increase dramatically over the past few years. Parents actively choose to leave a district because it does not meet their child’s needs or has failed their child either academically or from a relationship standpoint.”


Students are leaving school districts for a reason, and districts must look at the cause, she said.


The coalition “believes that cyber charter schools are a positive option for many families. We understand that for many others they may be perfectly satisfied with their neighborhood school,” Meyers wrote. “The bottom line is simple: it should be up to the parents, who know their children best, to decide where their child attends school, and these parents deserve to have cyber charter schools as an option. In Pennsylvania, we are fortunate to have public school choice. Limiting the types of public school choice offered will not result in better outcomes for students.”



Contact the writer:; 570-348-9133; @hofiushallTT

Please reload

Our Recent Posts

Please reload


Please reload


I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!

Please reload

©2019 BY CAOLA.  All rights reserved. CAOLA is a registered trademark of the Capital Area Online Learning Association. The CAOLA logo and other marks referenced herein are trademarks of the Capital Area Online Learning Association, and other marks are owned by third parties. CAOLA specifically disclaims any ownership of third party intellectual property or content posted by itself or others on this website through hypertext or object linking.